🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, producing a diluted aftermath of what raising awareness is for.

The History of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this movement and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the celebration is observed is a indication of the current political situation. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to weakening: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and experience from the historical documents is under way. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the Smithsonian Institution, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the month represents how minimally it can be effective if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or stripped of political content festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, assuming they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around historic Black characters) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not shy away from governmental matters, and leaves space for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of far-right rallies in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be pacified with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to subtle slights, but faced with the threats that face all if anti-racism is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.