🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and families are watching intently to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

In Europe, a increasing number of countries are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a law increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is provided. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," stated a leading parliamentarian driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any policy must be "based on robust data".

Last year, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build tools that are appropriate and suitable for children," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, action is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with any further access requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from various figures to copy this example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Outside of these regions, other countries are also exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international bodies adopt a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the policies of Australia and its followers indicate that governments internationally are less and less prepared to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.